Skip to main content

Eating Food Sacrificed to Idols

Seems that the education authorities still feel that feeding Christian and Sikh children food that has been sacrificed to idols is of no consequence. For a Christian we may eat meat that has been sacrificed in such a way as we are strong enough in our faith not to assign anything to that sacrifice. However, for those who are less set in the Christian faith there is always the danger that they could be led astray.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2575724/Parents-fury-pork-sausages-banned-school-menu-replaced-halal-meat.html

We have guidance in the Bible for circumstances such as this and Paul sums it up nicely.

1 Corinthians 8:1-13New Living Translation (NLT)

 Food Sacrificed to Idols
8 Now regarding your question about food that has been offered to idols. Yes, we know that “we all have knowledge” about this issue. But while knowledge makes us feel important, it is love that strengthens the church. 2 Anyone who claims to know all the answers doesn’t really know very much. 3 But the person who loves God is the one whom God recognizes.[a]

 4 So, what about eating meat that has been offered to idols? Well, we all know that an idol is not really a god and that there is only one God. 5 There may be so-called gods both in heaven and on earth, and some people actually worship many gods and many lords. 6 But for us,
There is one God, the Father,
by whom all things were created,
and for whom we live.
And there is one Lord, Jesus Christ,
through whom all things were created,
and through whom we live.

7 However, not all believers know this. Some are accustomed to thinking of idols as being real, so when they eat food that has been offered to idols, they think of it as the worship of real gods, and their weak consciences are violated. 8 It’s true that we can’t win God’s approval by what we eat. We don’t lose anything if we don’t eat it, and we don’t gain anything if we do.

 9 But you must be careful so that your freedom does not cause others with a weaker conscience to stumble. 10 For if others see you—with your “superior knowledge”—eating in the temple of an idol, won’t they be encouraged to violate their conscience by eating food that has been offered to an idol? 11 So because of your superior knowledge, a weak believer[b] for whom Christ died will be destroyed. 12 And when you sin against other believers[c] by encouraging them to do something they believe is wrong, you are sinning against Christ. 13 So if what I eat causes another believer to sin, I will never eat meat again as long as I live—for I don’t want to cause another believer to stumble.

Such is the arrogance of those that care naught about offending Christians, and in doing so leading astray Christian children, and Sikhs as they are forbidden from eating Halal slaughtered meat.

Time to ban Halal where it's sneaked in without telling anyone?

Comments

  1. Steve Hayes11 September 2014 at 07:48

    Would the same then apply to kosher food?

    I've never regarded kosher or halal food as having been sacrificed to idols.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Chris Hall11 September 2014 at 16:14

    Hi Steve, I suppose this revolves around the term 'sacrificed to idols'. If I slaughtered a sheep, and then my Muslim neighbour slaughtered a sheep according to Halal processes then he would be able to eat the meat of the sheep he slaughtered but would refrain from touching mine as he would consider it haram.

    In the Bible Paul says that there really is no difference between meat for the believer whichever way it is slaughtered. However the Muslim will believe that slaughtering whilst uttering 'Bismillah Allahu Akbar' in some way changes the meat from haram to halal. To me this has to be a spiritual dimension or act which could lead young Christians or those with a weak conscience away from faith. What other reason could there be for Paul's warning in 1 Co 8?

    I look upon the act of halal slaughter as a spiritual and religious act and so would extend to it the phrase 'sacrificed to idols' as I certainly don't equate the God of Abraham with the deity of Islam.

    So when it comes to Kosher or Schecita slaughter I don't have the same religious issues, as the link to me is the God of Abraham.

    However, I do have general issues with slaughtering of animals for food production. In the West we have it done on an industrial scale where I believe animal welfare is well below what I'm willing to accept. And in the religious slaughter I also believe animal welfare is well down on the list due to ignorance and insensitivity. That's why I don't eat meat any more.



    Coming back to the original issue there's also the fact that as consumers in the West we are not given the choice to decide whether to eat or not to eat such food as the information is withheld from us. I know this also happens with Kosher as the cuts of meat not deemed suitable are introduced into the 'unlabelled' food chain as well.


    To many people, both Muslim and non-Muslim there are real differences between halal and non-halal produce. We would never dream of passing off haram cuts of meat as halal (and kosher) and I believe that this sensitivity should work the other was as well.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Spammers, trolls and blatantly offensive posts will be summarily deleted. My blog, my rules. Otherwise comment away!

Popular posts from this blog

Sound familiar?

Watching the BBC interview of Adele by Graham Norton tonight and Adele sang one of the new tracks off her forthcoming album. The track was called A Million Years Ago. Listening to it reminded me of a different song by someone else. You know where you almost recognise a tune but get lost with the words, yet it's the words which are the key! Eventually it came to me, El Shaddai by Michael Card, famously sung by Amy Grant. It's a song that I occasionally play during worship. Have a listen. What do you think?
Post a Comment
Read more

The Upper Rooms

We often think of the 'upper room' as being the place where Jesus and the Disciples held the Last Supper but the Bible has many more 'upper rooms'.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Archbishop and Wonga

Image via CrunchBase Have to say I was initially chuffed to see the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby laying down a challenge to Wonga and others of their ilk. The AoC communicated that he wanted to see the payday loan industry driven out of business by promoting the use of credit unions. The payday loan industry is involved in outright usury which is condemned by many faiths such as Islam and Christianity and others. Usury we can look upon as the lending of money at exorbitant rates of interest. But then I thought what was the AoC actually saying? He wanted to replace excessive usury with not so excessive usury. Is that what we should be aiming for? Plus the architects of our current austerity are backing the AoC! I would love to see all of the credit industry driven out of business but it will only be done by paying workers a decent wage, sharing in the profit of their labour and making capitalism history. At the end of the day this sort of initiative is just a...
3 comments
Read more