Question on Romans 15:27

Image purloined from
http://tomorrowsreflection.com/faith-romans-1/

Sometimes you come across passages in the Bible that you struggle to understand. Other times you may have difficulty accepting what is being said. And other times you find variations between translations. I've been reading up on sharing and fellowship relating to koinonia (κοινωνία) and have found something which I'm struggling to get clarity over.

The verse in question is Romans 15:27 and I've given two example translations.

The New Living Translation gives

27 They were glad to do this because they feel they owe a real debt to them. Since the Gentiles received the spiritual blessings of the Good News from the believers in Jerusalem, they feel the least they can do in return is to help them financially.

And the Common English Bible gives

27 They were happy to do this, and they are actually in debt to God’s people in Jerusalem. If the Gentiles got a share of the Jewish people’s spiritual resources, they ought to minister to them with material resources.

Other translations tend to fall in one camp or the other. The problem I have is understanding who Paul is referring to - the Christian believers in Jerusalem or the Jewish people in Jerusalem? Quite an important point really and would value anyone else's take on this.

Anyone suggest how this is best resolved?

Authored by Chris Hall

Comments

The Upper Rooms

We often think of the 'upper room' as being the place where Jesus and the Disciples held the Last Supper but the Bible has many more 'upper rooms'.

Sound familiar?

Watching the BBC interview of Adele by Graham Norton tonight and Adele sang one of the new tracks off her forthcoming album. The track was called A Million Years Ago. Listening to it reminded me of a different song by someone else. You know where you almost recognise a tune but get lost with the words, yet it's the words which are the key! Eventually it came to me, El Shaddai by Michael Card, famously sung by Amy Grant. It's a song that I occasionally play during worship. Have a listen. What do you think?

The Archbishop and Wonga

Image via CrunchBase Have to say I was initially chuffed to see the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby laying down a challenge to Wonga and others of their ilk. The AoC communicated that he wanted to see the payday loan industry driven out of business by promoting the use of credit unions. The payday loan industry is involved in outright usury which is condemned by many faiths such as Islam and Christianity and others. Usury we can look upon as the lending of money at exorbitant rates of interest. But then I thought what was the AoC actually saying? He wanted to replace excessive usury with not so excessive usury. Is that what we should be aiming for? Plus the architects of our current austerity are backing the AoC! I would love to see all of the credit industry driven out of business but it will only be done by paying workers a decent wage, sharing in the profit of their labour and making capitalism history. At the end of the day this sort of initiative is just a...

The Sign Of The Cross

Search This Blog